The following document provides an overview of assumptions that the mrwater library is based on.
The allocation of potentially irrigated areas (PIA) is based on the
total volume of water requirements (sum of water requirements over all
crops grown under the selected cropmix) that is compared to the
available water (see calcRiverDischargeAllocation
). For the
case that crop-specific irrigation water requirements are reported to be
0 in the input data, no irrigation area is assigned to these crops in
the algorithm that derives PIA because the assumption is that irrigation
is not required there and therefore rainfed production takes place (see
calcPotIrrigAreas
).
print(paste0("Total rainfed area is, ",
round(sum(rfArea), digits = 2),
" Mha."))
print(paste0("Of these, ",
round(sum(rfArea[cropIrrigReq == 0]), digits = 2),
" Mha have 0 water requirements."))
print(paste0("That is, ",
round(sum(rfArea[cropIrrigReq == 0]) / sum(rfArea) * 100, digits = 2),
" % of rainfed land."))
However, for the scenario of ‘committed agricultural uses’ where
areas that are already irrigated are reserved for irrigation before the
allocation of additional potentials, areas that are reported to be
irrigated but show 0 irrigation water requirements (ca. 0.43 Mha,
i.e. 0.18% of irrigated area), areas are assigned to be irrigated (see
calcIrrigAreaActuallyCommitted
) to avoid data mismatches in
the area accounting.
print(paste0("Total irrigated area is, ",
round(sum(irArea), digits = 2),
" Mha."))
print(paste0("Of these, ",
round(sum(irArea[cropIrrigReq == 0]), digits = 2),
" Mha have 0 water requirements."))
print(paste0("That is, ",
round(sum(irArea[cropIrrigReq == 0]) / sum(irArea) * 100, digits = 2),
" % of irrigated land."))